NTDT 400: Macronutrients

NTDT 400: Macronutrients

Case Study Evaluation

Student Name: ____________________________ Case Study:____________________

Component	0 = Unacceptable	1 = Poor	2 = Adequate	3 = Exemplary	Score
Calculation of BMI	Missing or incorrect value and missing calculations	Correct value but no calculations provided	Incorrect value and but all calculations provided	Correct value and all calculations provided
Calculation of EER	Missing or incorrect formula, value and missing calculations	Incorrect formula, no calculations provided. Correct value	Correct formula, Incorrect value, but all calculations provided.	Correct formula, all calculations provided. Correct value
Vegan diet assessment	No discussion or discussion of irrelevant topics	Limited discussion of one or two special considerations. One must be protein complementation.	Detailed discussion of one special consideration – protein complementation	Detailed discussion of at least two special considerations. One must be protein complementation.
Strengths of current intake	One to two strengths of the intake are identified and no/limited rationale to support positive attributes of diet	Two to three strengths of the intake are identified and no rationale to support positive attributes is given	Two to three strengths of the intake are identified and limited discussion of rationale to support positive attributes of diet	Three strengths of the intake are identified and rationale to support positive attributes of diet clearly described
Recommended dietary changes to strengthen diet	One to two changes to the intake are identified and no/limited rationale to support dietary modifications	Two to three changes to the intake are identified and no rationale to support dietary modifications	Two to three changes to the intake are identified and limited discussion of rationale to support dietary modifications	Three changes to the intake are identified and rationale to support dietary modifications clearly described
DRI values and labels (unit of measure, ie % of energy, gm)	Less than 25% of all DRI values and labels for macronutrients and water are correctly defined	Between 25 and 50% of all DRI values and labels for macronutrients and water are correctly defined	Greater than 50% of all DRI values and labels for macronutrients and water are correctly defined	All DRI values and labels for macronutrients and water are correctly defined
Implemented changes are within 5% of DRI	Modified intakes for energy, more than 50% of the macronutrients and water are greater than 10% of the DRIs	Modified intakes for energy, at least 50% of the macronutrients and water are within 5% and 10% of the DRIs and the remaining nutrients are greater than 10% of the DRIs	Modified intakes for energy, all macronutrients and water are between 5% and 10% of the DRIs	Modified intakes for energy, all macronutrients and water are within 5% of the DRIs
Teamwork Evaluation (Based on separate rubric, mean of 3 to 4 would be 3 on this scale, mean of 0, 1 and 2 would translate exactly )
Total

NTDT400: Macronutrients

Team Member Evaluation

Evaluate your peer group members by assigning numbers based on individual performance in the group setting. The purpose of this evaluation is to help individuals understand how their work is perceived by others. Evaluations will be anonymous and will be used to assign points in the total case study evaluation. Complete an evaluation for each member of your team.

Name of team member being evaluated:________________________

Score key:

-1 = Hindered group effort 0 = made no contribution 1 = Contributed little

2 = Contributed adequately 3 = Contributed actively 4 = Made major contributions

Student’s preparation for and attendance at group meetings.

-1 0 1 2 3 4

Student’s participation during group meetings.

-1 0 1 2 3 4

Overall evaluation (Add all 6 evaluations and then divide by 6): _____________

Student’s performance on assigned tasks – quality of work.

-1 0 1 2 3 4

Student’s ability to work with others.

-1 0 1 2 3 4

Student’s ability to accept constructive criticism, compromise, and negotiate.

-1 0 1 2 3 4

Student’s ability to meet deadlines.

-1 0 1 2 3 4

NTDT 400: Macronutrients

Essay Evaluation

Student Name: ____________________________

Component	0 = Unacceptable	1 = Poor	2 = Adequate	3 = Very Good	4 = Exemplary	Score
Definition of healthful diet	No critical macronutrients, and functional components identified and no discussion of relationships to health and disease	Few critical macronutrients, and functional components identified and limited discussion of relationships to health and disease	Majority of critical macronutrients, and functional components identified and limited discussion of relationships to health and disease	All critical macronutrients, and functional components identified and limited discussion of relationships to health and disease	All critical macronutrients, and functional components identified and detailed discussion of relationships to health and disease
Recommended intakes of total carbohydrates	No mention of intake stated as percent of energy, value incorrect, Basis of intake related to health promotion/disease prevention not mentioned or incorrect	Intake stated as percent of energy, value incorrect, Basis of intake related to health promotion/disease prevention not mentioned or incorrect	Intake stated as percent of energy, value correct, Basis of intake related to health promotion /disease prevention not mentioned or incorrect	Intake stated as percent of energy, value correct, Basis of intake related to health promotion /disease prevention mentioned but no details provided	Intake stated as percent of energy, value correct, Basis of intake related to health promotion /disease prevention discussed using findings from research studies
Recommended intakes of dietary fiber	No mention of intake stated as grams, value incorrect, Basis of intake related to health promotion /disease prevention not mentioned or incorrect	Intake stated as grams, value incorrect, Basis of intake related to health promotion /disease prevention not mentioned or incorrect	Intake stated as grams, value correct, Basis of intake related to health promotion /disease prevention not mentioned or incorrect	Intake stated as grams, value correct, Basis of intake related to health promotion /disease prevention mentioned but no details provided	Intake stated as grams, value correct, Basis of intake related to health promotion /disease prevention discussed using findings from research studies
Recommended intakes of total fats	No mention of intake stated as percent of energy, value incorrect, Basis of intake related to health promotion/disease prevention not mentioned or incorrect	Intake stated as percent of energy, value incorrect, Basis of intake related to health promotion/disease prevention not mentioned or incorrect	Intake stated as percent of energy, value correct, Basis of intake related to health promotion /disease prevention not mentioned or incorrect	Intake stated as percent of energy, value correct, Basis of intake related to health promotion /disease prevention mentioned but no details provided	Intake stated as percent of energy, value correct, Basis of intake related to health promotion /disease prevention discussed using findings from research studies
Recommended intakes of saturated fats	No mention of intake stated as percent of energy, value incorrect, Basis of intake related to health promotion/disease prevention not mentioned or incorrect	Intake stated as percent of energy, value incorrect, Basis of intake related to health promotion/disease prevention not mentioned or incorrect	Intake stated as percent of energy, value correct, Basis of intake related to health promotion /disease prevention not mentioned or incorrect	Intake stated as percent of energy, value correct, Basis of intake related to health promotion /disease prevention mentioned but no details provided	Intake stated as percent of energy, value correct, Basis of intake related to health promotion /disease prevention discussed using findings from research studies
Recommended intakes of trans fatty acids	No mention of intake stated as percent of energy, value incorrect, Basis of intake related to health promotion/disease prevention not mentioned or incorrect	Intake stated as percent of energy, value incorrect, Basis of intake related to health promotion/disease prevention not mentioned or incorrect	Intake stated as percent of energy, value correct, Basis of intake related to health promotion/disease prevention not mentioned or incorrect	Intake stated as percent of energy, value correct, Basis of intake related to health promotion/disease prevention mentioned but no details provided	Intake stated as percent of energy, value correct, Basis of intake related to health promotion/disease prevention discussed using findings from research studies
Recommended intakes of protein	No mention of intake stated as grams per kg body wt, value incorrect, Basis of intake related to health promotion/disease prevention not mentioned or incorrect	Intake stated as grams per kg body wt, value incorrect, Basis of intake related to health promotion/disease prevention not mentioned or incorrect	Intake stated as grams per kg body wt, value correct, Basis of intake related to health promotion/disease prevention not mentioned or incorrect	Intake stated as grams per kg body wt, value correct, Basis of intake related to health promotion/disease prevention mentioned but no details provided	Intake stated as grams per kg body wt, value correct, Basis of intake related to health promotion/disease prevention discussed using findings from research studies
Recommended intakes of total water	Intake not stated as liters, none of the components of total water identified, incorrect values for total water provided, no discussion of intake related to prevention of dehydration	Intake stated as liters, none of the components of total water identified, incorrect values for total water provided, Limited discussion of intake related to prevention of dehydration	Intake stated as liters, none of the components of total water identified, correct values for total water provided, Limited discussion of intake related to prevention of dehydration	Intake stated as liters, some of components of total water identified and values for drinking water provided, Basis of intake related to prevention of dehydration	Intake stated as liters, all components of total water identified and values for drinking water and other beverage water provided, Basis of intake related to maintaining water balance
“Best” food choices – complex carbohydrates	No definition of best sources, and no food choices correct	No definition of best sources, some food choices correct	Attempted to define best food choices, some food choices correct	Clearly defined best sources, but not all food choices listed match definition	Clearly defined best sources and all food choices listed match definition
“Best” food choices – fiber	No definition of best sources, and no food choices correct	No definition of best sources, some food choices correct	Attempted to define best food choices, some food choices correct	Clearly defined best sources, but not all food choices listed match definition	Clearly defined best sources, and all food choices listed match definition
“Best” food choices – monounsaturated fatty acids	No definition of best sources, and no food choices correct	No definition of best sources, some food choices correct	Attempted to define best food choices, some food choices correct	Clearly defined best sources, but not all food choices listed match definition	Clearly defined best sources and all food choices listed match definition
“Best” food choices – polyunsaturated fatty acids	No definition of best sources, and no food choices correct	No definition of best sources, some food choices correct	Attempted to define best food choices, some food choices correct	Clearly defined best sources, but not all food choices listed match definition	Clearly defined best sources and all food choices listed match definition
“Best” food choices - protein	No definition of best sources, and no food choices correct	No definition of best sources, some food choices correct	Attempted to define best food choices, some food choices correct	Clearly defined best sources, but not all food choices listed match definition	Clearly defined best sources and all food choices listed match definition
Writing conventions	Numerous errors (>7) in spelling, grammar, punctuation, or capitalization	Many errors in (5-7) spelling, grammar, punctuation, or capitalization	Some errors (2-4) in spelling, grammar, punctuation, or capitalization	Few errors (<2) in spelling, grammar, punctuation, or capitalization	Written with no spelling, grammar, punctuation, or capitalization errors
Total Score

Points on Final Exam	Score	Interpretation of Score
10	53-56	A
9.5	50-52	A-
8.8	48-49	B+
8.5	47	B
8.2	45-46	B-
7.8	43-44	C+
7.5	42	C
7.2	40-41	C-
6.5	<40	D

Rubrics for NTDT 401

for the learning goal #1.

NTDT401 has a snack assignment. The instruction can be found at http://napa.ntdt.udel.edu/ntdt401/food/nutrient_analysis.htm. The following rubrics to grade the assignment:

Proper nutrient analysis: 20 points

Critically evaluate the snack’s nutrient density and fat content. 20 points

Being creative without repeating the snack idea from what were already submitted 10 points

For the learning goal #3.

NTDT401 uses exams to assess that.